|
|||||||||
|
December 21, 2009
December 21, 2009
The Obama Carbon-Scam
Posted by Savant Noir under Climate Change, Sustinable EconomicsLeave a Comment
A combination of interesting mainstream and alternative media reports reveal compelling links between president Obama and a privately owned carbon trading group, which also has direct ties with elitist groups such as the Club of Rome and the Trilateral Commission.
Judi McLeod’s excellent article for Canada Free Press, which she expanded from a Fox News piece, highlights how years before he became president, Obama helped directly fund a carbon trading exchange that will likely play a critical role in the proposed cap-and-trade carbon reduction program.
The charity was the Joyce Foundation on whose board of directors Obama served and which gave nearly $1.1 million in two separate grants that were “instrumental in developing and launching the privately-owned Chicago Climate Exchange, which now calls itself “North America’s only cap and trade system for all six greenhouse gases, with global affiliates and projects worldwide.”
Essentially Obama helped fund the profiteers of the carbon taxation program that he is now seeking to steer through Congress.
McLeod also notes that The Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) has direct ties to both Al Gore and Maurice Strong, two figures intimately involved with a long standing movement to use the theory of man made global warming as a mechanism for profit and social engineering.
Gore’s investment company, Generation Investment Management, which sells carbon offset opportunities, is the largest shareholder of CCX.
While Maurice Strong, who is regularly credited as founding father of the modern environmental movement, serves on the board of directors of CCX. Strong was a leading initiate of the Earth Summit in the early 90s, where the theory of global warming caused by CO2 generated by human activity was most notably advanced.
While McLeod’s article highlights the cronyism and corporate dealings behind this set up, we should also add the fact that both Gore and Strong come from a stable of elite groups that have long sought to use the environmental movement to advance their agendas.
Strong, who was groomed by David Rockefeller to eventually serve as Director of the Rockefeller Foundation, is also a member of the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Club of Rome.
Gore too comes from the Club of Rome clique.
Lets take a look at the connections these groups have to the environmental movement.
 |
|
 |
|
In 1990, writes veteran reporter Jim Tucker, the Bilderbergers adopted climate change as the preferred model to impose global government and reintroduce serfdom. “Like the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group discovered the issue of environmental deterioration. Bilderbergers embraced a report from the Trilateral Commission that year on the environment, because the potential profit in cleaning up the mess would be immense.”
The following year, the Club of Rome think tank published The First Global Revolution, a book suggesting a draconian neo-Malthusianism approach will solve the world’s “problems”, in fact a problem the global elite has with humanity.
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill,” the book states. “All these dangers are caused by human intervention,” and thus the “real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
Richard Haass, the current president of the Council on Foreign Relations, expanded on this topic in his article, State sovereignty must be altered in globalized era. According to Haass, a system of world government must be created and sovereignty eliminated in order to fight global warming and terrorism, both invented as the Club of Rome suggested.
“Some governments are prepared to give up elements of sovereignty to address the threat of global climate change,” writes Haass. “The goal should be to redefine sovereignty for the era of globalization, to find a balance between a world of fully sovereign states and an international system of either world government or anarchy.”
In the past, the Club of Rome has resorted to deceptive tactics in order to support their plans. In 1972, the Club of Rome, along with an MIT team released a report called Limits to growth. The report stated that we were to reach an environmental holocaust by the year 2000 due to overpopulation and other environmental problems. Support for their conclusions was gathered by results from a computer model. Aurelio Peccei, one of the founders of the Club of Rome, later confessed that the computer program had been written to give the desired results.
As we reported two years ago, During the secretive Trilateral Commission group meeting in March 2007, elitists gathered to formulate policy on how best they could exploit global warming fearmongering to ratchet up taxes and control over how westerners live their lives.
Why is this so concerning? Because groups such as the Club of Rome are contracted out by our own governments and the UN to prepare ‘Policy Guidance Documents’ which they use in formulating their policies and programs. How come the Club of Rome gets the gig? Simply because many high ranking UN and government officials are also CoR members, or have direct corporate ties to members. The same goes for the CFR and the Trilateral Commission.
A recently unearthed documentary that sought to expose this agenda at its inception is George Hunt’s excellent research piece on the environmental movement.
Considering the information unearthed concerning Obama’s links to all of this, it is not surprising that he is now pushing the “cap-and-trade” carbon tax program, which in reality represents a war on the middle and working classes.
Prior to the election, Obama called for drastically reducing carbon emissions by 80 per cent, a move that would inflict a new Great Depression, cost millions of jobs, and sink America to near third world status.
The 80 per cent figure is a huge leap towards the ultimate goal, expressed by the Carnegie Institute last year and afforded sober credibility by the corporate media – a complete reduction down to zero carbon emissions.
As we have previously noted, such a move would lead to the near complete reversal of hundreds of years of technological progress and man’s return to the stone age.
December 21, 2009
The Club of Rome and the UNFCCC
Posted by Savant Noir under Agenda 21, De-Population, Globalization1 Comment
Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime- sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus, the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and the oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DC’s and LDC’s, and including all food on the international market. The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and or each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime should have some power to enforce the agreed limits.” John P. Holdren, Paul and Anne Ehrlich, Ecoscience, 1977
The Copenhagen conference on climate change at the beginning of next month seeks to, according to its creators, “reach a new global accord to replace the 1997 Kyoto Protocol to curb emissions of greenhouse gases”. UN-front man Ban Ki-Moon remarked at a preparation speech on the road to Copenhagen that “sooner or later there will be a higher price on carbon – imposed either by policy or by market forces.” All this just rolls off the tongs of these transnationalist as if they are whistling a tune while tending their garden. If there was no such thing as historic fact, it would sound noble, urgent, and necessary. Unfortunately, we know precisely what motivates the initiators of this global effort: profit, absolute control and- I almost forgot- depopulation of the world’s inhabitants. This garden the elite is cultivating is by no means a place of joy. It stinks of rotten weeds and dead foliage.
In this first of several articles, I set out to identify the blueprint of modern day eugenics and its intimate ties to the environmental movement. In fact, the more one researches this union, forged in the blood of millions in the last century, the more one realises that the anthropogenic global warming swindle is not just tied to eugenics. It is eugenics.
In 1968 a think-tank emerged out of the back alleys of the face-lifted eugenics movement called the Club of Rome. Nurtured from its very conception as a beacon of light to which all environmentalist ships should navigate, its creators knew that the green movement they had set out to create, was designed to blame man for the supposed predicament the earth was in. As a consequence the number of people should be reduced lest the earth crumble under his crushing weight. The only thing to be done, so argued the Club, was for a global body of power to enforce depopulation goals as decided upon by the global elite.
Of what people does this global elite consist? Well just google ‘Club of Rome members’ and compare the names on the membership lists with those on the list of attendants of the annual Bilderberg conferences and you will discover the very same cast of characters, setting up the rules in the New World Order. You’ll find Al Gore, David Rockefeller, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, and all the other enemies of all free humanity and their cronies.
In 1972, the self described “group of world citizens, sharing a common concern for the future of humanity” published their (in)famous “The Limits to Growth”. In this document the authors point-blank argue for the population to shrink if mother earth is to survive much longer: “The overwhelming growth in world population”, claim the authors, “caused by the positive birth-rate loop is a recent phenomenon, a result of mankind’s very successful reduction of worldwide mortality.”
This development is highly worrisome, says the Club of Rome. As possible solutions for this “problem” it proposes either the birthrate to be brought down “to equal the new, lower death rate”, or “the death rate must rise again.” The following example will show that these statements by the world’s upper elites are in no way innocent musings without consequence.
Contrary to popular belief, the original architect of China’s policies was neither Mao Zedong in a power-drunk whim nor a Party-sadist hatching eugenics in some sub-level torture chamber. According to anthropologist Susan Greenhalgh in her study ‘Just One Child: Science and Policy in Deng’s China’ the inspiration for the tyrannical move by the Chinese Communist Party was inspired first and foremost by the Club of Rome.
In the early seventies, a group of Chinese scientists visited several scientific conferences in Europe, and readily picked up on the ideas distributed by the Club of Rome. At the head of this Chinese delegation was a man credited for introducing China’s notorious one-child policies, source of so much hardship suffered by the Chinese people in the last decades.
Greenhalgh points out that the infamous policy “had roots in missile scientists’ exposure to and import of Club of Rome population concepts through international conferences in the 1970s.”
The ‘missile scientists’ Greenhalgh mentions, are Dr. Song Jian and company, visiting several conferences in Europe in the 1970s designed to further the glory and prestige of the People’s Republic of China around the world. They picked up and further developed several methods to calculate population rates on blueprint models used by the Club of Rome to calculate their scams into creation. The fact that the Club of Rome stands at the cradle of one-child policies may not come as a complete surprise to those who have read all the policy-papers issued from the seventies onward. The same Malthusian idea that triggered our current green movement and its obsession with man-made global warming mythology once inspired hardcore involuntary sterilization policies in the decades preceding World War II.
In order to force a rising death rate into being one needs to create “a common motivation, namely a common adversary, to organize and act together in a vacuum; such a motivation must be found to bring the divided nations together to face an outside enemy, either a real one or else one invented for the purpose.”
In the 1991 publication “The First Global Revolution: A Report to the Club of Rome” by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, the common denominator that the world would need to rally around was identified in all clarity:
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution,the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
This contrived and purposeful enemy arrived in the shape of man-made global warming. And to think that all of us gullible gadgets were fooled into believing that any climate change was caused by that big lamp in the sky, determining not just earth’s overall temperatures but those of all planets in the solar system.
It just goes to show that the scam is perpetrated on such an unprecedented scale, that few dare question its validity. The entire thing of course boils down to the old Nazi proverb: the bigger the lie, the easier the sell. The United Nations, the globalist foremost salesman, was designated to carry the message along to all the world’s ‘regions’ and all nation-states falling under her jurisdiction. The division of the UN deemed most qualified to do the job was UNESCO, the scientific arm deciding what educational programs are to be distributed amongst the world’s universities and primary schools. On June 15th of this year, Martin Lees, Secretary General of the Club of Rome gave a speech to UNESCO- social engineers in which he admits that:
“We in the Club of Rome have had a long relationship with UNESCO. We look forward to developing our future collaboration so that we can advance our understanding and cooperation to promote action on the critical global issues which will determine the future of us all at this difficult moment in history.”
To understand what this collaboration between the Club of Rome and UNESCO will specifically entail, Mr. Lees provides us with the agenda leading up to and following the Copenhagen conference next month. Just so you know what to expect from the social engineers in the year to come:
“In October 2009, we will focus at our Annual General Assembly in Amsterdam on “Environment, Energy and Economic Recovery” focused on the key issues for the Copenhagen Climate Conference. In February 2010 we will tackle Cluster Three, on International Development. In April 2010 we will focus on Cluster Four, Social Transformation and in July 2010, on Peace and Security. The Programme will conclude with a major event in November 2010.”
The agenda shows that the Copenhagen conference is not an isolated happening. It is just one piece of the overall global architecture the elite is constructing and with which it means to consolidate power in the 21st century. Or, as the Secretary General of the Club of Rome puts it:
“Issues of international governance and institutional architecture will be critical in particular to the effective implementation of a post-Kyoto Treaty. To address the underlying drivers of climate change, institutional mechanisms must be introduced or adapted to implement and coordinate new policies in key areas of concentration such as: finance; science and technology; human resource development; information and communications; and capacity building. And the issue of “climate justice” will be central to achieving any agreement and to the acceptance of any treaty.”
Irrespective of these world players’ vested interest in such an architecture, they all dance to the tune of eugenics- whether they are aware of it or not. It can be to further their career or some sadist pleasure in usurping innocence; whatever their motivation, they have openly declared themselves to be on the opposite side of humanity.
December 21, 2009
De-Population
Posted by Savant Noir under Agenda 21, Climate Change, De-Population, Globalization, Sustinable EconomicsLeave a Comment
The basis for the depopulation agenda is a standard all elitist’s hold dear. This standard is called:
The Hegelian Dialectic:
Problem – Reaction-Solution
Create the Problem Cause a Reaction Offer a Solution
You will see exactly how they have created the problem; caused a reaction so widespread it is really quite impressive how successful they have been; and offered a solution: A deadly solution.
I ask that you please make an attempt to distribute this paper everywhere you possibly can. The time grows short and so many are going to be caught unawares. By getting the word out, you may be able to prevent someone from needless pain and suffering.
|
|
 |
|
| Aldous Huxley | |
William Benton, Assistant U.S. Secretary of State at UNESCO 1946: (UNESCO is the United Nations Education, Science and Cultural Organization)
“As long as a child breathes the poisoned air of nationalism, education in world-mindedness can produce only precarious results. As we have pointed out, it is frequently the family that infects the child with extreme nationalism. The schools therefore use the means described earlier to combat family attitudes that favor jingoism (nationalism)…we shall presently recognize in nationalism the major obstacle to development of world mindedness. We are at the beginning of a long process of breaking down the walls of national sovereignty. UNESCO must be the pioneer.” (Emphasis mine throughout)
Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, 1991:
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill (this is absolute proof that man made global warming is a fabrication)…. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap of mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
Mikhail Gorbachev:
“We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”
Aldous Huxley, Brave New World 1946:
“There is, of course, no reason why the new totalitarians should resemble the old. Government by clubs and firing squads, by artificial famine, mass imprisonment and mass deportation, is not merely inhumane (nobody cares much about that nowadays); it is demonstrably inefficient and in an age of advanced technology, inefficiency is the sin against the Holy Ghost.”
Aldous Huxley, Lecture named Population Explosion 1959:
“…Let us ask ourselves what the practical alternatives are as we confront this problem of population growth. One alternative is to do nothing in particular about it and just let things go on as they are…The question is: Are we going to restore the balance in the natural way, which is a brutal and entirely anti-human way, or are we going to restore it in some intelligent, rational, and humane way…Try to increase production as much as possible and at the same time try to re-establish the balance between the birth rate by means less gruesome than those which are used by nature – by intelligent and human methods?…There are colossal difficulties in the way of implementing any large-scale policy of limitation of population; whereas death control is extremely easy under modern circumstances, birth control is extremely difficult. The reason is very simple: death control – the control, for example, of infectious diseases – can be accomplished by a handful of experts and quite a small labour force of unskilled persons and requires a very small capital expenditure.”
Barry Commoner, Making Peace with the Planet:
“There have been ‘triage’ proposals that would condemn whole nations to death through some species of global ‘benign neglect’. There have been schemes for coercing people to curtail their fertility, by physical and legal means that are ominously left unspecified. Now we are told that we must curtail rather than extend our efforts to feed the hungry peoples of the world. Where will it end?” Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, April 28, 1997, Testimony before Congressional Committee: “There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that’s why this is so important.”
|
|
 |
|
| Jacques Cousteau | |
Jacques Cousteau UNESCO Courier 1991:
“In order to save the planet it would be necessary to kill 350,000 people per day.”
Jacques Cousteau, Population: Opposing Viewpoints:
“If we want our precarious endeavor to succeed, we must convince all human beings to participate in our adventure, and we must urgently find solutions to curb the population explosion that has a direct influence on the impoverishment of the less-favoured communities. Otherwise, generalized resentment will beget hatred, and the ugliest genocide imaginable, involving billions of people, will become unavoidable.”
“Uncontrolled population growth and poverty must not be fought from inside, from Europe, from North America, or any nation or group of nations; it must be attacked from the outside – by international agencies helped in the formidable job by competent and totally non-governmental organizations.”
Bertrand Russell, The Impact Of Science On Society 1953
“I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing… War… has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full… The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s… There are three ways of securing a society that shall be stable as regards population. The first is that of birth control, the second that of infanticide or really destructive wars, and the third that of general misery except for a powerful minority…”
Henry Kissinger, 1978:
“U.S. policy toward the third world should be one of depopulation”
David Rockefeller, 2000:
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”
David Rockefeller: Memoirs 2002 Founder of the CFR:
“We wield over American political and economical institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political structure, one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
David Rockefeller, Co-founder of the Trilateral Commission:
|
|
 |
|
| David Rockefeller | |
“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine & other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plans for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. Thomas Ferguson, the Latin American Case Officer for the State Department’s Office of Population Affairs (OPA) (now the US State Dept. Office of Population Affairs, est. by Henry Kissinger in 1975): “There is a single theme behind all our work -we must reduce population levels,” said Thomas Ferguson, the Latin American case officer for the State Department’s Office of Population Affairs (OPA). “Either they [governments] do it our way, through nice clean methods or they will get the kind of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran, or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it. “The professionals,” said Ferguson, “aren’t interested in lowering population for humanitarian reasons. That sounds nice. We look at resources and environmental constraints. We look at our strategic needs, and we say that this country must lower its population -or else we will have trouble.
“So steps are taken. El Salvador is an example where our failure to lower population by simple means has created the basis for a national security crisis. The government of El Salvador failed to use our programs to lower their population. Now they get a civil war because of it…. There will be dislocation and food shortages. They still have too many people there.” (1981)
Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, April 28, 1997; Testimony before Congressional Committee:
“And advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.”
Sir Julian Huxley, UNESCO: its Purpose and its Philosophy:
“Political unification in some sort of world government will be required… Even though… any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.” In the early 1950’s, former Communist Joseph Z. Kornfeder expressed the opinion that UNESCO was comparable to a Communist Party agitation and propaganda department. He stated that such a party apparatus ‘handles the strategy and method of getting at the public mind, young and old.’ Huxley would lard the agency with a motley collection of Communists and fellow travelers.
President Richard Nixon believed abortion was necessary as a form of eugenics to prevent interracial breeding
Theodore Roosevelt to Charles B. Davenport, January 3, 1913, Charles B. Davenport Papers, Department of Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.:
“I wish very much that the wrong people could be prevented entirely from breeding; and when the evil nature of these people is sufficiently flagrant, this should be done. Criminals should be sterilized and feebleminded persons forbidden to leave offspring behind them…The emphasis should be laid on getting desirable people to breed…”
|
|
 |
|
| Theodore Roosevelt | |
Theodore Roosevelt:
“Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind…. Any group of farmers, who permitted their best stock not to breed, and let all the increase come from the worst stock, would be treated as fit inmates for an asylum…. Some day we will realize that the prime duty, the inescapable duty of the good citizens of the right type is to leave his or her blood behind him in the world; and that we have no business to permit the perpetuation of citizens of the wrong type. The great problem of civilization is to secure a relative increase of the valuable as compared with the less valuable or noxious elements in the population… The problem cannot be met unless we give full consideration to the immense influence of heredity…” “I wish very much that the wrong people could be prevented entirely from breeding; and when the evil nature of these people is sufficiently flagrant, this should be done. Criminals should be sterilized and feebleminded persons forbidden to leave offspring behind them… The emphasis should be laid on getting desirable people to breed…”
By Carl Teichrib:
“The Georgia Guidestones, a massive granite edifice planted in the Georgia countryside, contains a list of ten new commandments for Earth’s citizens. The first commandment, and the one which concerns this article, simply states; “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.”
Robert Walker, former chair of PepsiCo and Proctor & Gamble on water:
Water is a gift of nature. Its delivery is not. It must be priced to insure it is used sustainably.
Ted Turner makes the radical statement that, “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal,”
Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood, funded by the Rockefellers) said in her proposed “The American Baby Code”, intended to become law:
“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
This is the woman (Margaret Sanger) whom Hillary Clinton publicly declared she looked up to, during the 2008 presidential debates.
Here is a short list of some advocates of eugenics; Alexander Graham Bell, George Bernard Shaw H. G. Wells, Sidney Webb, William Beveridge, John Maynard Keynes, Margaret Sanger, Marie Stopes, Woodrow Wilson, Theodore Roosevelt, Emile Zola, George Bernard Shaw, John Maynard Keynes, John Harvey Kellogg, Winston Churchill, Linus Pauling, Sidney Webb, Sir Francis Galton, Charles B. Davenport Futurist Barbara Marx Hubbard (who wanted to create a Dept. of Peace):
“Out of the full spectrum of human personality, one-fourth is electing to transcend…One-fourth is ready to so choose, given the example of one other…One-fourth is resistant to election. They are unattracted by life ever evolving. One-fourth is destructive. They are born angry with God…They are defective seeds…There have always been defective seeds. In the past they were permitted to die a ‘natural death’…we, the elders, have been patiently waiting until the very last moment before the quantum transformation, to take action to cut out this corrupted and corrupting element in the body of humanity. It is like watching a cancer grow…Now, as we approach the quantum shift from creature-human to co-creative human—the human who is an inheritor of god-like powers—the destructive one-fourth must be eliminated from the social body. We have no choice, dearly beloveds. Fortunately you, dearly beloveds, are not responsible for this act. We are. We are in charge of God’s selection process for planet Earth. He selects, we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse, Death. We come to bring death to those who are unable to know God…the riders of the pale horse are about to pass among you. Grim reapers, they will separate the wheat from the chaff. This is the most painful period in the history of humanity…”
|
|
 |
|
| Henry Kissinger | |
Alexander Haig is quoted referring to the US State Department Office of Population Affairs, which was established by Henry Kissinger in 1975. The title has since been changed to The Bureau of Oceans, International Environmental and Scientific Affairs:
“Accordingly, the Bureau of Oceans, International Environmental and Scientific Affairs has consistently blocked industrialization policies in the Third World, denying developing nation’s access to nuclear energy technology–the policies that would enable countries to sustain a growing population. According to State Department sources, and Ferguson himself, Alexander Haig is a “firm believer” in population control.
Although the above stated quotes should be sufficient to prove that the elitists in power have definite intent to depopulate this planet to what they deem to be a sustainable level. Some will argue these are only opinions and are of no real consequence. I will now move on to providing bits of documentation showing this is a plan that has a worldwide scope of influence.
Most of these documents are at least 10 years old, some older. That however, does not take away from the seriousness of the content. Do not think them invalid due to their age. It takes time to foment plans on such a grand scale. But, if you are honest with yourself you can see glimpses of these things happening today.
I am going to cover some issues stemming from the UN Treaty on Biological Diversity (Agenda 21), which Bill Clinton signed into law in 1993 before it was sent to the U.S. Senate for ratification.
EPA Internal Working Document Ecosystem Management:
“The executive branch should direct federal agencies to evaluate national policies…. in light of international policies and obligations, and to amend national policies to achieve international objectives.”
“In other words, our federal bureaucrats are writing U.S. law, independent of Congress who has Constitutional authority to do that. They are changing regulations and creating laws out of thin air.”
“They are no longer working for the people of the United States. They are working for the international community. There are so many treaties written up that they have (effectively) bound the United States. Whereas a few of the treaties were not a problem, the abundance (100’s) of them have now taken control over all of our lives” -Michael Coffman
UN Treaty on Biological Diversity Assessment on Desirable Culture:
“…Traditional societies have considered certain sites as sacred, where most human activities are prohibited.”
That is the heart of the Convention on Biodiversity. Locking up nearly 50% of the land area of the United States is their idea of protecting biological diversity. -Michael Coffman
UN Treaty on Biodiversity Diversity Usage of Fertilizers Not Sustainable:
“That fertilizers have played an essential part in producing the world’s harvests is undisputed. (It) is estimated that if the use of fertilizers ceased, the world’s harvests would be cut almost in half. However, the negative side of the equation is that the nitrates from fertilizers seep into ground water aquifers and they are seriously implicated in the eutrophication of lakes, rivers and coastal ecosystems causing often drastic changes in the fauna and flora.”
“They are willing to take a course of action that will reduce the world’s food supply by half, or more, as they will likely reduce the use of pesticides knowing full well how many people this will kill”. -Michael Coffman
UN Biodiversity Assessment on Sustainable Human Population; US Senate September 9, 1994:
“A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be one billion people. This must be implemented within 30-50 years, 2/3’s of the population must be cut.”
“The UN says property rights are not absolute and unchanging, but are there for the convenience of whatever government wants to do.” – Michael Coffman
“Nobody owns biodiversity, so everything we do impinges on biodiversity. Property rights become meaningless. At the Rio De Janeiro Summit it was decided that the Global Environmental Facility would be the depository of all property rights.” – Michael Coffman
UN Biodiversity Assessment The Worldview of Western Civilization Section 12.2.3, Page 835:
The western “worldview is characteristic of large-scale societies, heavily dependent on resources brought from considerable distances. It is a worldview that is characterized by the denial of sacred attributes of nature… (which) became firmly established about 2000 years (ago) with the Judeo-Christian-Islamic religious traditions.”
This same treaty considers rocks to be living beings on an equal plane with human beings. Rocks, many believe, will reincarnate into lower life forms; and gradually into human beings.
Bureau of Land Management Internal Working Document
|
|
 |
|
| “Soylent green is… humans.” | |
Human Dimensions of Ecosystem Management Objective/Purpose: “All ecosystem management activities should consider human beings as biological resources…” (Reminiscent of Soylent Green)
This document was brought before Congress. This statement created such an uproar that it was removed. Regardless of its removal, it still serves to prove the mindset of these people; and just because this was removed from a document it does not mean it was removed from the thoughts and the intended goals of those who penned it; or who believe it.
“For the elite to be able to have management of the ecosystem, humans would have no more value than a rock.” – Michael Coffman
UN Biodiversity Treaty UN Global Biological Assessment Sustainable Human Populations:
“Population growth has exceeded the capacity of the biosphere” (i.e. the earth) “It is estimated that an ‘agricultural world’ in which most human beings are peasants should be able to support 5 to 7 billion people.”
Now I feel is an appropriate time to cover some other areas of government, as well as private organizations that would like to see the population of the world decrease at an astounding rate (up to 90%). This is a dark, bloody agenda that will cause terrible hardship and pain upon millions of people.
World Wildlife Fund, World Resources Institute International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN):
The IUCN involves the EPA, US Fish & Wildlife Service, the National Park Service, the United States Forest Service, Sierra Club, the Nature Conservancy, the National Wildlife Fund, the National Audubon Society, National Resources Defense Council, UNESCO, the Environmental Defense Fund, the U.N. Environmental Program, etc. .
IUCN 1992
Covenant On the Environment and Development: “Eventually a wilderness network would dominate a region and thus would itself constitute the matrix, with human habitations being the islands. The remaining half of the US would be used as buffer zones.”
“The night before this treaty was ratified, Senator Mitchell withdrew it from the calendar and it was never voted on. It took four men, devoted to God in prayer to stop this treaty. The treaty still waits in the wings. Upon ratification, the US will have no ability to protect its own citizens.” -Michael Coffman
Henry Kissinger had a similar plan to use food as a weapon in 1974, found in the National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests; which was adopted as official policy by then President Gerald Ford in November of 1975. This Memorandum outlined a covert plan to reduce population growth in lesser-developed countries by means of birth control, and implicitly, war and famine. Brent Scowcroft, who had by then replaced Kissinger as National Security Advisor, (the same post Scowcroft held in the Bush Administration), was put in charge of implementing the plan. CIA Director George H.W. Bush was ordered to assist Scowcroft, as were the Secretaries of State, Treasury, Defense and Agriculture.
This document has never been renounced, only certain portions have been amended, leaving it as the foundational document on population control issued in the U.S. Government.
The major players in the founding of this document are as follows:
Henry Kissinger Richard Nixon Margaret Sanger Paul Ehrlich Werner Fornos Timothy Wirth The United Nations Population Fund The United States Agency for International Development Planned Parenthood Federation of America International Planned Parenthood Federation The Club of Rome UNICEF WHO United Nations World Bank
The document can be read here in its entirety, along with the other organizations and individuals complicit in this abomination:
http://www.usmutes.com/NSSM200.htm
|
|
 |
|
| Adolph Hitler | |
Let it be noted that Adolph Hitler also used food as weapon, stating that food is “a beautiful instrument…for maneuvering and disciplining the masses.” Food has been used as a weapon of war for centuries. Why then would it be outrageous for the elite to use food as a weapon, both a physical and a psychological weapon, in a declared war on overpopulation? It would not be outrageous at all. As has been said time and time again, history repeats itself.
Now we will cover the Earth Charter.
The Earth Charter; A Radical Global Religion, created by Mikhail Gorbachev and Michael Strong: “The Earth Charter initiative reflects the conviction that a radical change in humanity’s attitudes and values is essential to achieve social, economic and ecological well-being in the 21st century… The commission…plans to circulate a final version of the Charter as a People’s Treaty beginning in mid-1998. The Charter will be submitted to the U.N. General Assembly in the year 2000…(where it will) ensure a very strong document that reflects the emerging new global ethics.” This is unprecedented (it is) the first component of an authentic global governance. We are working for dialogue and peace. We are demonstrating our ability to assert control over our fate in a spirit of solidarity to organize our collective sovereignty over this planet, our common heritage.”
The American people were not allowed to see this. Americans as a whole do not want the UN to be the head of a world government. The one thing the majority of this country values, above most everything else, is their freedom. Or the semblance of freedom we have left should I say.
At the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, the Presidential Council on Sustainable Development in 1996 came to the conclusion that the world’s human population should not exceed 500 million people. That is a 93% reduction in population!
According to the UN video, “Armed to the Teeth”; and also in the Freedom From War Policy -put into effect by JFK in 1961-general and complete disarmament and US military power was given over, in full, to the UN. This is a loss of the sovereignty of America. (Read this document at http://www.scribd.com/doc/5009662/Freedom From-War).
The Earth Charter (1992), A Spiritual Vision: “A consensus has developed that the Earth Charter should be…the articulation of a spiritual vision that reflects universal spiritual values, including, but not limited to, ethical values …a people’s charter that serves as a universal code of conduct for ordinary citizens, educators, business executives, scientists, religious leaders, non-governmental organizers and national councils of sustainable development; and a declaration of principles that can serve as a “soft tax” document when endorsed by the UN General Assembly. ”
In its original form, The Earth Charter failed miserably due to open, blatant pantheistic approach. Gorbachev and Strong have worked diligently to change the language and make it appear less obvious. You may be wondering what the Earth Charter has to do with depopulation. It has everything to do with it. Here is a very brief synopsis of what the Charter holds for us.
According to the Charter, we must:
* “Recognize that all beings are interdependent and every form of life has value…” (Unborn children, of course, are not included in the UN’s definition of “every form of life.” The Earth Summit II documents continue to support the UN’s pro-abortion policies.)
* “Affirm faith in the inherent dignity of all human beings.” (UN agencies, however, support policies of euthanasia for those determined not capable of living a “quality” life.)
* “Adopt at all levels sustainable development plans and regulations….” (This is a prescription for global socialism in a super-regulated global state.)
* “Prevent pollution of any part of the environment…” (Enforcing this dictum would mean stopping virtually all human activity.)
* “Internalize the full environmental and social costs of goods and services in the selling price.” (This seemingly harmless sentence would empower the state to price, tax, and regulate all production and consumption.)
* “Ensure universal access to health care that fosters reproductive health and responsible reproduction. (This is a thinly disguised call for that includes abortion and population control.)
* “Eliminate discrimination in all its forms, such as that based on race … [and] sexual orientation.” (This provision is clearly aimed at criminalizing those who refuse to accept homosexuality as positive and good.)
* “Promote the equitable distribution of wealth within nations and among nations. (See;
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/The+new+world+religion%3a+presented+to+the+world+as+a+mystical… a091968392 for the full article)
|
|
 |
|
| Earth Charter | |
The Earth Charter has not been ratified. Do not make the mistake of assuming it has not been interwoven into our society, however! It is being taught in our schools and promoted shamelessly by Hollywood, the UN, NBC (owned by GE), ABC, CBS, CNN, HLN & all the Fox owned stations, with the exception of Fox News in order to keep the supporters blinded to the machinations of Rupert Murdock. Do not be deceived!
The ability to freely procreate is soon to be removed from us, much as it has been in China for many years. Not only will we not be allowed to have children, anyone who is termed a “useless eater” (A term coined by Henry Kissinger) will be euthanized: Mercilessly culled.
In Sweden , the “Sterilization Act of 1934″ provided for the voluntary sterilization of some mental patients. The law was passed while the Swedish Social Democratic Party was in power, though it was also supported by all other political parties in Parliament at the time, as well as the Lutheran Church and much of the medical profession. -Wikipedia
America is scheduled to become compliant to Codex Alimentarius (CA) as of December 31, 2009.
Codex Alimentarius is going to regulate virtually anything that you put into your mouth that is not a pharmaceutical. The World Trade Organization (WTO) has accepted Codex Alimentarius and any nation that is a member of the WTO must become compliant with CA. In any dispute between 2 countries, the one that is Codex compliant automatically wins. This is quite an incentive for all nations to become compliant. – Rima Laibow
CA guidelines set for vitamins & minerals are said to be voluntary, however, they are scheduled to become mandatory on December 31, 2009. In 1994, Codex Alimentarius declared nutrients to be poisons: See the Dietary Supplement Health Education Act (DSHEA). Yet fluoride is acceptable! Why? It creates complacency. Proper nutrients will ensure a longer, healthier life. Not at all in keeping with a depopulation agenda.
From Esoteric Agenda, a documentary by Ben Stewart:
“In 1962 it was decreed that there would be a move toward total global implementation of Codex Alimentarius. The date set for implementation is December 31, 2009. WHO and FAO are the commissions in charge of CA. They fund it and run it at the request of the U.N.
According to WHO & FAO, epidemiological projections, it is estimated that according to the vitamin and mineral guideline alone; when CA goes into global implementation on December 31, 2009, it will result in a minimum of 3 billion deaths; 1 billion due through starvation. The next 2 billion will die from preventable diseases due to malnutrition.”
“The U.N. has put out dozens of reports calling for an 80% reduction in population (most put the number at 90%). At the 1997 Women’s World Conference in Beijing, the head of the U.N. Food Program said, “We will use food as a weapon against the people.””
In conjunction with Codex Alimentarius, food will be limited and water consumption will be decreased to 10 gallons per day, per person. The average American uses 140 gallons of water every day. The food provided will be Genetically Modified and nutrient deficient.
As of the Codex Alimentarius (CA) implementation date of 12/31/09, if there were a famine anywhere in the world, it will be illegal to send any high nutrient density biscuits. Or to distribute them!!
Once a country becomes CA compliant, CA can never be repealed. Membership with the WTO robs the member nations of any and all sovereignty. Germany is now CA compliant.
Codex Alimentarius goes hand in hand with Agenda 21 and the Kyoto Treaty. The deadline to implement both Agenda 21 and the Kyoto Treaty is 2012.” (Rima Laibow)
Agenda 21 was birthed out of the Rio Summit 1992. Agenda 21 (A 21), a.k.a. Smart Growth, Regionalism, Visioning Processes, Action Plans, Shared Values; 20/20, Best Practices; Community Festivals & Public/Private Partnerships. These are the names you will hear A 21 called, the buzzwords.
Every county must set up a council to oversee the implementation of A 21. A 21 is Sustainable Development. Steven Rockefeller set up the Earth Charter, referenced above. The Earth Charter is the new One World Religion: Earth worship. The earth is considered to be ‘sacred’, and its protection is a ‘sacred trust’. Global responsibility will demand basic changes in values, behaviors and attitudes of government, the private sector, and civil society.
Under Sustainable Development man is considered to be responsible for the pollution of the planet and is subordinate to all other living creatures. This is a direct contradiction to the Bible where God placed man in a position of dominance over the entire earth. The elite will worship and serve the creature, rather than the Creator.
“The environmental agenda is a spiritual agenda with earth worship at its root. As such, the following practices are all considered to be unsustainable: Fossil fuels, artificial fertilizers, modern systems of agricultural production, irrigation water, herbicides, pesticides, farmland, pastures, grazing of livestock, consumerism, dietary habits, salt, sugar, private property, paved roads, dams, reservoirs, logging activities, fencing of pastures”. – Joan Peros
“Every environmental resource must be measured. What can be measured can be managed under the Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Project.” – Joan Peros
Among the things considered to be unsustainable, as listed above, these are included: Monotheism and the family unit. The health care plan of President Obama is under A 21. Under this health care plan, the family unit is very much being attacked. Anyone over age 65 must undergo ‘end of life counseling’ by their doctor every 5 years. Abortion will be pushed that much harder, especially with the Science Czar wanting sterilants put into our water supply! One of the new appointee’s to the Obama Administration once said in a book he co-wrote that a child could be killed up to the age of 2 years old! What kind of a monster could think that is acceptable?
Nearly the exact language used to define Sustainable Development was taken from the 1977 Soviet Constitution!
The Family Dependency Ratio, under the United Nations, will look at every household. They will gauge what that household has produced in accordance with what it has used (i.e., resources) by the water bills, energy bills, etc. Are you using more than you are producing? Are you adding to the collective, or merely taking away? This is how the powers that be will determine whether you are a productive citizen, or, in the words of Henry Kissinger, “A useless eater”.
In 1990, Prince Charles formed The Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum to bring together 50-60 of the world’s topmost multi-national/transnational corporations to start buying up governments around the world. This is Public/Private Partnerships: This is the very definition of fascism.
I must stop here. At the rate things are now moving, I could add to this daily. But, December 31 is not so far away now, only 4 months. I must get this out now. Time is short.
November 20, 2009
Dear Senator:
RE: Health Care Reform
- We do not need, nor do we want Government intervention reforming health care.
- We are in agreement that there needs to be some health insurance reform
- We are aware that apprx. 8 million citizens have no health benefits, and that those that find themselves without benefit are left out because of inefficiencies in your current programs. Thus, we suggest you fix the programs you already have to enable benefit to those that you currently exclude.
- We recognize and support the need for cross-state free market competition to help lower insurance costs.
- We recognize that tort reform could help lower costs by an additional 10-15% and that you should focus your efforts on providing solutions that serve the American people; not your ideologies.
- We recognize and support the reform of insurance in regards to non-discrimination against pre-existing conditions.
- We recognize the need and support insurance portability.
We object vehemently to the Government imposing it’s will upon the people. We vigorously oppose how you continually over-step your Constitutional boundaries. We object to this notion that you know best, when it is obvious that your own house is in shambles. We object further taxation to support another hare-brained conception, until such a time that you have demonstrated an ability to run any program. Before imposing your will upon the people we suggest you provide evidence of fiscally responsible business management. Your entitlement programs currently have 60 trillion dollars of unfunded liabilities. Every government run Agency and Program is either bankrupt or in debt. You have continually mismanaged our money.
When ideology succeeds in repressing all historical and empirical evidence of your abject failures, the public rightly must question your sanity, integrity, or both. We have had enough. A vote of YES on any form of health care reform, will result in a resounding NO from us when it comes time for your re-election.
————————————————————————————————
Sen. Michael F Bennet, Colorado
DC Office Phone Number: 202-224-5852, DC Fax Number: 202-228-5036
Sen. Ben Nelson, Nebraska
DC Office Number: 202-224-6551, DC Fax Number: 202-228-0012
Sen. Mary Landrieu, Louisiana
DC Office Phone Number: 202-224-5824, DC Fax Number: 202-224-9735
Sen. Mark Pryor, Arkansas
DC Office Phone Number: 202-224-2353, DC Fax Number: 202-228-0908
Sen. Blanche Lincoln, Arkansas
DC Office Phone Number: 202-224-4843, DC Fax Number: 202-228-1371
Sen. Robert Byrd, West Virginia
DC Office Phone Number: 202-224-3954, DC Fax Number: 202-228-0002
Sen. Jim Webb, Virginia
DC Office Phone Number: 202-224-4024, DC Fax Number: 202-228-6363
Sen. Mark Warner, Virginia
DC Office Phone Number: 202-224-2023, DC Fax Number: 202-224-6295
Sen. Jon Tester, Montana
DC Office Phone Number: 202-224-2644, DC Fax Number: 202-224-8594
Sen. Joe Lieberman, Connecticut
DC Office Phone Number: 202-224-4041, DC Fax Number: 202-224-9750
Sen. Mark Begich, Alaska
DC Office Phone Number: 202-224-3004, DC Fax Number: 202-224-2354
Sen. Evan Bayh, Indiana
DC Office Phone Number: 202-224-5623, DC Fax Number: 202-228-1377
November 11, 2009
In the Beginning..
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”–Al Gore, Club of Rome executive member.
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis…”– David Rockefeller, Club of Rome executive member
“We require a central organizing principle – one agreed to voluntarily. Minor shifts in policy, moderate improvement in laws and regulations, rhetoric offered in lieu of genuine change – these are all forms of appeasement, designed to satisfy the public’s desire to believe that sacrifice, struggle and a wrenching transformation of society will not be necessary.”
- Al Gore, Earth in the Balance
“Adopting a central organizing principle…means embarking on an all-out effort to use every policy and program, every law and institution…to halt the destruction of the environment.“- Al Gore, Earth in the Balance
“Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level.” — UN Agenda 21 (signed by G.Bush, 1992)
“The goal now is a socialist, redistributionist society, which is nature’s proper steward and society’s only hope.”
- David Brower, founder of Friends of the Earth
“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsiblity to bring that about?”- Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programme
“We must make this an insecure and inhospitable place for capitalists and their projects. We must reclaim the roads and plowed land, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams, free shackled rivers and return to wilderness millions of acres of presently settled land.”- David Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!
——————————————————————————————————————————————————-
Here and Now, and the Future
“Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class – involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, air-conditioning, and suburban housing – are not sustainable.“- Maurice Strong, Rio Earth Summit
“A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible.”- United Nations,
Global Biodiversity Assessment
“The extinction of Homo Sapiens would mean survival for millions, if not billions, of Earth-dwelling species. Phasing out the human race will solve every problem on Earth – social and environmental.”- Ingrid Newkirk, former President of PETA
“Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”- David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club
“The spiritual sense of our place in nature…can be traced to the origins of human civilization….The last vestige of organized goddess worship was eliminated by Christianity.“- Al Gore, Earth in the Balance
“Christianity is our foe. If animal rights is to succeed, we must destroy the Judeo-Christian Religious tradition.”
- Peter Singer, founder of Animal Rights
Climate change is real. Not only is it real, it’s here,and its effects are giving rise to a frighteningly new global phenomenon: the man-made natural disaster.“- Barack Obama, US President
November 11, 2009
Dear Senator/Congressman
RE: Health Care Reform
- We do not need, nor do we want Government intervention reforming health care.
- We are in agreement that there needs to be some health insurance reform
- We are aware that apprx. 8 million citizens have no health benefits, and that those that find themselves without benefit are left out because of inefficiencies in your current programs. Thus, we suggest you fix the programs you already have to enable benefit to those that you currently exclude.
- We recognize and support the need for cross-state free market competition to help lower insurance costs.
- We recognize that tort reform could help lower costs by an additional 10-15% and that you should focus your efforts on providing solutions that serve the American people; not your ideologies.
- We recognize and support the reform of insurance in regards to non-discrimination against pre-existing conditions.
- We recognize the need and support insurance portability.
We object vehemently to the Government imposing it’s will upon the people. We vigorously oppose how you continually over-step your Constitutional boundaries. We object to this notion that you know best, when it is obvious that your own house is in shambles. We object further taxation to support another hare-brained conception, until such a time that you have demonstrated an ability to run any program. Before imposing your will upon the people we suggest you provide evidence of fiscally responsible business management. Your entitlement programs currently have 60 trillion dollars of unfunded liabilities. Every government run Agency and Program is either bankrupt or in debt. You have continually mismanaged our money.
When ideology succeeds in repressing all historical and empirical evidence of your abject failures, the public rightly must question your sanity, integrity, or both. We have had enough. A vote of YES on any form of health care reform, will illicit a resounding NO from us when it comes time for your re-election.
Link to all Representatives Fax/Phone
Link to all Senate Fax/Phone
November 11, 2009
It is obvious to us all by now that Obama & Company are out to transform the basic fabric of America. He actually told us he would; just few of us realized what he fully meant. In fact, Obama is not the originator of this phrase, but after careful planning and plotting he was chosen to be the anointed one, to be the Hammer that delivers the final nail into the coffin of America. By the end of his regime, he will be the Messiah of Our Future dispensing his Golden Alms to a populace that will be dependent upon them for their very survival. It is a bi-partisan agenda, for when the coffin lid shuts, we all suffocate together.
I will make my stance very simple. I believe in the Constitution and the principles it was founded upon. I believe in those values and morals that developed a self-deterministic life that was the fortitude of the American psyche that inspired our fledgling nation to greatness. I believe you feel exactly the same way.
As the cacophony of change whirls about us in a cyclonic maelstrom of confusion, I feel it is important to focus more on the question many have: “what can we do?”
To answer this question is going to require about an hour of your time initially. I have consolidated information that is necessary to become an aware and thereby effective voice of American activism.
If you will notice, the links below come from wordpress. I have set this up for the sole purpose of simplicity, to set aside a space that does not lose my blog posts amongst all the other great and insightful posts that exist here. Links pertaining to this circumscribed subject matter I include here for you.
We are distracted, and this is exactly what Obama wants. Not only are we doing it to ourselves, we are also allowing ourselves to be played like puppets. It is a tactical trick to split the Left and Right, the White and the Black. Never forget that resistance breeds only counter-resistance, and this serves as the ultimate distraction so the hidden strategic agenda can be slipped in like a thief in the night.
Step 1: The Big Picture: Although some of you are already aware of this, Obama is leading the charge to transform this country in a manner that is consistent with the United Nations protocols of Sustainable Development/Agenda 21. It is of the utmost importance to understand this thoroughly. You cannot possibly perceive all these Bills in their proper perspective unless you understand the backdrop in which they all reside and tie together. Our energies become exhausted trying to keep up with “content”. That too is a tactic of obfuscation. Congressional concessions followed by more massive bills is all done for the purpose of hiding“context”. When we understand the ‘whole’, we are not so easily distracted by the trickery of the superficial. We can see things for what they really are, and this will automatically sharpen our focus and bring the fear of revelation to them!
Sustainable Development/Agenda 21
Step 2: Human Awareness: The psychology of the liberal mind and liberal society needs to be understood. It was brought to my attention that a liberal Psychiatrist by the name of Dr. Haidt of Yale University had conducted a worldwide testing model and over the course of 10 years, came to pretty much the same conclusions as myself. An analysis of his findings follow my links. The reason why this is essential is to develop communication strategies that will enable us to possibly convey something to our Liberal fellow Americans. Without a more unified front, we are doomed.
Liberal Regressive Immaturity
Liberal Individual Narcissistic Characteristics
Social Narcissism
Moral Adolescence
Step 3: Reason and Logic: This is not likely to go over well with the typical Liberal, for the very reasons explained above. Nonetheless, we all need ’something’ in our arsenal to attempt to convey. Here you will find a post that moved away from its original intent, but I highlighted those questions that are germane, and can be asked of a Liberal and might serve to open up a dialogue.
Communications Between the Left and the Right
Step 4: Follow Through-a strategy after the tea parties and rallies: Our success in rallying Conservatives for the incredible 912 March is only half the action–it is the ‘threat’. It is reduced to meaninglessness unless we make good on our threat. If we do not demonstrate that we are firm in our resolve, the future is made all the tougher for us. If we threaten to ‘kick them out’, then by God, we better do it! To that end, the link below provides a strategy for voting in 2010.
Also, there is another page that has links to every seat up for election in every state at every level. We need to vote from the ground up.
Step 5: Unification: I belong to 25 ning sites, another 20 facebook groups, an active writer on I don’t know how many online newspapers, etc. It’s ridiculous. I am overwhelmed and I am sure you are as well. Each individual wakes up each day with a finite amount of time and energy. Neither I nor you can be effective if we are dividing our time and energy in 50 different directions. I am not suggesting we quit our respective sites, but I am suggesting very strongly that at least we have ONE place where we ALL connect. To this end, I suggest Facebook. As it is, most people from all these different sites have a Facebook account or can easily get one. We have to start somewhere, so add me (Savant Noir) to your Friends. Then we need to start going to each other’s homepage and adding each other’s friends. This needs to be a viral effort. The result of this is that one blog post goes to ALL. We don’t have to keep going here and there.
Step 6: Selectivity: There are sites that are well funded and have built operational models that best highlight the strategic goals I am espousing herein. Icacus for their vetting processes, Citizens in Action for their fax center, AmericaC2C for their State participation groups, and Team Grassfire for their national campaigns. I recommend these sites be used for their specific purpose and we start reducing the distractions in our lives.
http://www.teamgrassfire.com/
http://citizensinaction.ning.com/
http://icaucus.ning.com/
http://americac2c.ning.com/
In addition to condensing our site participation, we can save ourselves a lot of wasted energy by limiting our research sources and our daily information sources. There is so much hyperbole, speculation, and just outright hysterical nonsense out there, that this just either helps spread falsehoods and rumor, or bogs others down who have to research its veracity. On my WordPress site, I have condensed resource links down to the ‘best of the best’ , and broken them into groups. You can rely on the Heritage Foundation, Cato Institute, American Thinker, Sunlight Foundation, Wall Street Journal, etc., as online sources. If your resource articles do not have collaborative links or references attached to it, chances are it is half-baked truths. This should serve as a guideline to your own posts as well. If you are making a post about ‘facts’, include your reliable references to substantiate them. In this manner, you do not force others to have to do your homework for you, nor, are you guilty of spreading rumor yourself. As an example, WND I deem to be 70% reliable, and often their reference links are Hal Turner or some other sensationalist. There are many government links on my WordPress site as well, several of them rather unique.
Step 7: Community Participation. An example of this is a program I am working on with my fellow members of the local Republican Assembly, where we are going out to various college campuses and meeting with the Young Republican groups there, helping them distribute literature, with ideas, meetings, etc. As you know, the youth are by great majority in support of Obama, and being programmed into the Liberal Agenda. The youth of today is the preservation of our country tomorrow. Reach out to them.
Occasionally I will design fliers and post them. These can be posted in your neighborhoods and distributed among friends and family. We must continually think of creative ways to impart our message. Newspaper editorials is another way. Share your ideas regarding pro-activity with the rest of us, this is a group effort.
I could go on and on with ways to be an active participant. Everything that we do counts. Continue to email and fax the politicians. When you have a letter you urge others to send, then help them in these efforts by providing the necessary links and information to complete the task you are requesting of your fellow patriot. Town hall meetings, tea parties, and major rallies such as this one in Washington will still require the impetus of your presence, so let’s keep the pressure on.
Step 8: Liberal Websites: I am not suggesting being a disruptive troll. When we post to one another our conservative thoughts or articles from conservative sites, we are merely preaching to the choir. As infuriating a task as it is, I still try to take a message straight to the heart of the liberal camp. I post at Daily Kos, Huffington Post, and the DNCC. If you are armed with what I hope to be some of the additional knowledge I have provided here, then you have some new approaches to try. If you convert just 1 liberal, they in turn might convert 10.
Step 9: Blog Sites: Create you own personal Blog Site with WordPress or Blogspot. Create several if you want, devoting each one to a specific topic. This is an important action you can easily take. When you create a blog site, search engines will pick it up. Try and choose a name for your blog site that will be most guaranteed to get hits, such as: Health Care today. I have created another blog site myself, called The Green Scheme, which is solely devoted to Agenda 21. Read my opening paragraph (at the above link) for an example of how I advertise a ‘neutral’ position on the facts.
When we post to each other, we communicate our passions that serve to galavinze each other, and to seek identification of our frustrations. The idea behind creating your personal blog sites is to catch the attention of Liberals as well; to help spread a message. Liberals are not going to go to Team Sarah (for instance) for the purpose of trying to learn anything. Avoid names that reveal a particular political leaning. When you make posts on these blogs, stick with the facts and give solid, reputable reference links. The idea is to encourage the viewer to read the post, and to then make their own judgment. If your post says: “guess what that insane bitch Pelosi did this week….”, you will have set in motion their resistance and failed to get your point across.
When you make a post, be sure to add ‘tags’. This is the best way to get ‘hits’ to your website. Get all your friends to get a blog space as well. You can have as many as you want, and they take about 30 seconds to set up. Take your area of most interest, knowledge, and concern and make a blog today! This is an excellent way to carve out some space on the internet for our Conservative view. This idea came to me when researching Agenda 21. There are literally thousands of sites out there all extolling the virtues of ‘going green’, and what a hero Al Gore and Van Jones are. I found only 2 websites that reveal the political dangers inherent in their method of carrying out their agenda. Help make our presence known to the WORLD, not just to each other!
Step 10: Take some time and go out to small businesses and drop off a flyer. Small business owners tend to be Conservatives that don’t really have enough time in the day to stay aware of current events. They also may have 5-100 employees that they in turn can influence. It will cost you next to nothing to print off 500 or so flyers from your home printer, or simply go to Kinko’s. Enclosed below is a link to a flyer I designed that you can use, or, desing one yourself. It is also important to make people aware of Agenda 21, the school of thought which is driving ALL this current legislation. A brochure that can be printed out is located at the bottom left hand side of the article itself.
Health Care Flyer
Agenda 21 Brochure
Complete List of Senators: click here:
Complete List of Representatives: click here:
We must win back America. We can win and we will win, all it takes is the desire that burns intensely enough in your soul to propel you to action. The next step is to turn that action into effective action. I hope this serves as a springboard to ignite your imagination and spirit.
Step 12: YOU! Many of you are like myself, a political neophyte. I don’t profess to be ‘the best’ or to ‘know the most’. Hell, I don’t even know if I am any good at this…I only know that I am trying my best. I am just one more spoke in the wheel. Unless we find the resources to be a light unto ourselves, our mission will fail. WE are the world. What you see around you, WE created. When we change ourselves, the world will change to reflect our collective will. I am a single pebble casting myself upon the waters. I make a little ripple, and not much of a splash. Stand by my side and we make a bigger splash and create more ripples. Stand united and we will explode and create a tsunami of change!
November 10, 2009
“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine & other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plans for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government”. –David Rockefeller in 1991 speech at Bilderberg Convention
Many people that could be rallied to a strong oppositional stance against Global Socialism are not getting our message. To be honest, I am more upset with the Conservative that may be standing at my side, than I am at the Liberals.
We Conservatives are the last hope to save this country. America as we have known it is walking a tightrope while inebriated; precariously balanced on one toe while teetering on the brink of destruction in the dark abyss that awaits us below.
But sadly, when I look at most of my fellow Conservatives, they somehow think that talking about these things is synonymous to doing something about it. While rife with anxiety and despairing over the gloom that befalls us, many react in a way that would be consistent with a drug addict. They become addicted to sensationalism. The “excitement”, be it good or bad, is externalized and assuages internal anxieties either through external identifications or external incorporations. This restores us to a state of equilibrium, until the next sensation negatively impacts us, and we then become involved with the knee-jerk reaction to defeat the offending primary inducement.
That primary sensation needs to inspire action, not the ineffectual defense of re-action. Conservatives become easily manipulated by Obama & Co. as they force a strengthening of our intellectual reactive defense mechanisms. Because Conservatives have erected intellectual defense responses, they are driven to delve into “content”, thus wasting time and energy dissecting each piece of legislation ad infinitum. Do you really believe you can keep up? It is impossible to do so. Although it is impossible to assimilate all this information, the intellectually compensated conservative keeps digging away nonetheless, and then in a rush of anxiety bombards all their fellow conservatives with the latest tidbit of revelation about this or that.
What next? Then we post and re-post the same unimportant tidbits over and over, and then dissect it further as we embroil ourselves in the commentaries that stimulate more hysterical reactions. We then rush to the phone or send a fax expressing to our leaders how we will not put up with this. Are they listening? No. What then ensues is posting the letters we have received back from our leaders, the one’s that show their blatant disregard for us. This entire Circle of Uselessness seems to have become nothing more than a hobby.
Why do I call these tidbits useless? The obvious first answer is simply because it has not worked. It does not work because it only reveals to our leaders that their psychological methods of ‘distraction’ are working perfectly. So they laugh at us, while we become increasingly more frustrated; perpetuating the same ineffectual behaviors that got us nowhere in the first place.
It is important to understand that both ‘this’ and ‘that’ reside in a greater “context” that contains each. Health Care reform, Cap and Trade, The Global Poverty Act, and all legislation that comes out of Washington did not just magically appear out of thin air for any specific singular purpose. To successfully get our message out, we must make a comprehensive argument that completes the circle of logic. Content must be linked to Context, and then the whole needs to be explained in terms of immediate impact of the ‘content’, and the long term affect as each piece of legislation moves us closer to the contextual outcome. All 4 parts must be laid out in a concise verifiable manner. By so doing, we then demonstrate to our Leaders that we are fully aware of their agenda and its affect. Until such a time that our oppositional voice displays a full comprehension, they will continue to chuckle at us while inflating their own egos further due to the success they continue to derive by duping us.
What we currently are witness to is the implementation of a strategy that has been carefully crafted since the early 1900’s. There are a multitude of ‘conspiracy theories’ that arise in the effort to explain all these happenings, but they fail to be provable as they also fall short of making the connection between legislation and the agenda they are purporting is the drive behind the legislation. These conspiracy theories serve to ameliorate internal stressors in the same fashion as discussed in the opening paragraphs. They are as infinitely invigorating as they are useless; and forever remain a distraction from concerted comprehensive action.
What is the agenda behind all that we are currently being subjected to? In a nutshell, that answer is Agenda 21. Understand that Agenda 21 is the outcome of policies and strategies that have a 60 year history that precedes Agenda 21, but this is unimportant and remains relegated to the domain of ‘distraction’. Keep it simple.
This was signed by G.H. Bush in 1992 and became policy in this country. In 1993, by Executive Order, Bill Clinton created the President’s Council of Sustainable Development. The international protocols of Agenda 21 were adapted and re-named Sustainable America.
Simply by looking at the 40 chapter titles of Agenda 21 one can readily discern how current legislation can be linked to these protocols.
An example of how the policies of Agenda 21 are driving legislation can be seen in the excerpts highlighted below. As we are all aware, Cap and Trade will give the EPA control over your house. The EPA will set eco-standards that each homeowner must comply to. This particular legislature is straight out of Agenda 21 and has spread throughout this country under the name ’smart growth’.
Exposing the context behind the content; and how this context has perniciously pervaded every aspect of our politics, business, education, etc; is no easy task to assemble completely, no one man can do it alone. It is incumbent upon each and every one of us to fit the picture together and try to defeat these bills by exposing them for their true insidious nature.
“The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
- Club of Rome,
premier environmental think-tank,
consultants to the United Nations
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“We need to get some broad based support,
to capture the public’s imagination…
So we have to offer up scary scenarios,
make simplified, dramatic statements
and make little mention of any doubts…
Each of us has to decide what the right balance
is between being effective and being honest.“
- Prof. Stephen Schneider,
Stanford Professor of Climatology,
lead author of many IPCC reports
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“We’ve got to ride this global warming issue.
Even if the theory of global warming is wrong,
we will be doing the right thing in terms of
economic and environmental policy.”
- Timothy Wirth,
President of the UN Foundation
The above quotes are just a few of the 1,000’s that could have been used to illustrate the political agenda that has been underway formally since 1967. The notion of globalization has been a plan for much longer, but it was not until 1967 that the perfect solution to bring it all about was realized—Global Warming. Global Warming was the precursor to bring about an entire school of thought that ultimately became known as Sustainable Development. Sustainability drives all facets of our life; for in the name of sustainability restrictions must be placed on people, land, food, water, energy, waste, transportation, and a radical new paradigm of thought to embrace all these changes through education.
My call to duty for fellow Conservatives is to ’sharpen the knife’. Regardless your particular political interest, be it abortion, medicine, energy, etc., always link your information to the ‘original source’, demonstrate its legislative implementation, and then tie the outcome back to original source. Unless we can communicate in terms that make our leaders aware that we have exposed them, then they remain unafraid to march ahead with their destruction of America.
If you have no idea where the battlefield is, you have no hope of even engaging in the war. When you enter the battlefield, you must be armed with the proper weapons to win the war. Without awareness, and comprehensive dissemination of information, our message remains disjointed and ineffective. Every post needs to contain the words ’sustainable development’ or Agenda 21. Post and comments that do not link ’cause-effect’ in the context of its proper framework will be a waste of your time (as the past 2 years have shown us), and it will contribute to others wasting their time as well.
November 15, 2009
Top 10 Cities with Greatest Levels of Poverty
Posted by Savant Noir under Political Commentary, Uncategorized | Tags: democrat, liberal, poverty, social, urban |[3] Comments
“You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away people’s initiative and independence. You cannot help people permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.”–Abraham Lincoln
U..S.Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007
What do the top ten highest poverty rate cities (over 250,000 pop.) all have in common??
Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn’t elected a Republican mayor since 1961;
Buffalo, NY (#2) hasn’t elected one since 1954;
Cincinnati , OH (3rd)…since 1984;
Cleveland , OH (4th)…since 1989;
Miami , FL (5th) has never had a Republican mayor;
St. Louis , MO (6th)…..since 1949;
El Paso , TX (7th) has never had a Republican mayor;
Milwaukee , WI (8th)…since 1908;
Philadelphia , PA (9th)…since 1952;
Newark , NJ (10th)….since 1907.
Einstein once said, ‘The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.’
It is the poor who habitually elect Democrats—yet they are still POOR.
…and, Mr. Obama, you are quite obviously not an Abe Lincoln.
=